基于改进FRAM的航班地面保障能力评估
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国民航大学 电子信息与自动化学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

V351.11;TB111

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(U2333205)


Evaluation of Flight Ground Support Capabilities Based on Improved FRAM
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对机场和航空公司运行效率低下,决策能力不足的问题,提出了一种基于功能共振分析模型的航班地面保障能力评估方法;通过对航班保障流程进行分析,利用区间值犹豫模糊熵和层次分析法将保障环节之间的关系量化,结合保障环节的大小、可变性以及环节之间的耦合得到航班保障能力评估结果,从而确定该航班地面保障节点最优构型;使用某机场航班地面保障数据进行实验仿真,结果表明:实际运行与期望之间存在的均方误差为6.015min,平均绝对误差为2.389min,误差与保障时间窗之比约为0.28,与航班的效能评估值近似相加为1,反应实际与期望之间的差距;此外改变权重方法对比分析, 航班保障关键节点的平均绝对百分误差均低于13%,且均比熵权法的值低。

    Abstract:

    Aiming at the problems of low operation efficiency and insufficient decision-making ability of airports and airlines, a method of assessing flight ground protection capability based on the functional resonance analysis model is proposed; by analyzing the flight protection process, quantifying the relationship between the protection links using interval value hesitation fuzzy entropy and hierarchical analysis, and evaluating the flight protection capability by combining the size and variability of the protection links with the coupling between the links, the optimal configuration of the flight ground protection node is determined. The result is to determine the optimal configuration of the ground protection node of the flight; the experimental simulation is carried out by using the data of the flight ground protection of an airport, and the result shows that: the mean-square error between the actual operation and the expectation is 6.015min, and the average absolute error is 2.389min, and the ratio of the error to the protection time window is about 0.28, which is approximated to the evaluation value of the flight's performance as 1, which is a response to the gap between the actual and the expectation; in addition, the weighting method is changed, and the weighting method is changed to the weighting method. In addition, the average absolute percentage errors of the key nodes of the flight guarantee are lower than 13% and lower than that of the entropy weighting method in the comparison analysis of the weighting methods.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邢志伟,李雅婷,周芳宇,张涛,罗谦.基于改进FRAM的航班地面保障能力评估计算机测量与控制[J].,2026,34(2):266-274.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-05
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-12
  • 录用日期:2025-03-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码